![f 22 lightning 3 su 35 f 22 lightning 3 su 35](https://www.lavocedelpatriota.it/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/F-22-vs-F-35.jpg)
The Su-35’s larger size and the canted position of the engines and greater thrust required also contribute to a heat signature that is significantly greater than Typhoon’s.
![f 22 lightning 3 su 35 f 22 lightning 3 su 35](https://www.wearethemighty.com/uploads/2021/06/070713-F-8820I-124-1140x558-1.jpeg)
The Su-35 has a significantly greater Radar Cross Section (RCS) than Typhoon due to its large intakes without effective fan-blade shielding, vertical dual stabilizers and thrust vectoring jet nozzles, as well as the latter’s greater use of radar absorbent materials and signature management for canards. How does it compare to Typhoon in terms of the following: This drives down serviceability to significantly below US, British and French fighter fleets, except in the case of small forward deployments such as Syria where the entire logistics chain can be concentrated on keeping a small portion of the force at high readines However, as with many other aspects of the Russian military, the fact that the production and service numbers of the Su-35 are quite low and exist within a huge mix of various MiG-29 and Su-27/30 derivations which do not share many key components means that running costs are high and logistics remain complex. They appear to offer a greater average serviceability rate than previous iterations of the Su-27/30 family, as well as the MiG-29, mainly due to the success of the new Saturn 117S thrust vectoring engines which have so far avoided many of the reliability issues of previous models. JB: Russia has 48 Su-35S in service with another 48 scheduled for production. HK: What is the current status of the Russian Su-35 fleet? If you’ve enjoyed an article you can donate here. This site is in peril as it is well below its funding targets.
![f 22 lightning 3 su 35 f 22 lightning 3 su 35](https://steam-account.ru/img/product/f/f-22-lightning-3/f-22-lightning-3.jpg)
We also look at how the Su-35 would fare against the US’ F-15, F-16 and F-22. We asked Justin Bronk from the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) think-tank his thoughts on the Su-35’s combat effectiveness against the Typhoon, the backbone of NATO’s fighter force. Outside the Western world, Russia’s ultra-agile Su-35 is the most potent fighter in operational service.